4 Exemplary

3.25 Proficient

2.5 Limited

1 Deficient

Peer Evaluation

Self-Evaluation

Teacher Evaluation

FCA 1:  Format (10%--20 points)

·  Double-spaced or skipped lines (writing on only one side of paper)

·  Computer generated: <= 12 point, Arial, Comic Sans, or Times New Roman, margins <= 1.25”, no extra spaces between paragraphs

·  Heading includes name, due date, period, title of paper

·  Works Cited section is correct

·  Double-spaced or skipped lines (writing on only one side of paper)

·  Computer generated: <= 12 point, Arial, Comic Sans, or Times New Roman, margins <= 1.25”, no extra spaces between paragraphs

·  Heading includes name, due date, period, title of paper

·  1-3 errors with MLA citation OR Works Cited

·  Double-spaced or skipped lines (writing on only one side of paper)

·  Computer generated: <= 12 point, Arial, Comic Sans, or Times New Roman, margins <= 1.25”, no extra spaces between paragraphs

·  Heading includes name, due date, period, title of paper

·  4 + errors with MLA citation or Works Cited

One of the following is missing

·  Double-spaced or skipped lines (writing on only one side of paper)

·  Computer generated: <= 12 point, Arial, Comic Sans, or Times New Roman, margins <= 1.25”, no extra spaces between paragraphs

·  Heading includes name, due date, period, title of paper

OR

·  MLA parenthetical notation or Works Cited is absent

_______x 5 =

______

_______x 5 =

______

_______x 5 =

______

FCA 2:  Content  (60%--120 points)

·   3+ relevant, connected quotations from literature, or other sources

·   quotations are  (numbered (1))

·   Paper length  = 2+pages

·   Developed, logical, clear, concise thesis

·   Thesis is underlined

·  Presence of introduction and conclusion paragraphs

·  Original work

·   3 relevant, connected quotations from literature, or other sources quotations are  (numbered (1))

·   Paper length  = 2 pages

·   Clear, logical thesis &  is underlined

·  Presence of introduction and conclusion paragraphs

·  Original work

·   2 relevant OR connected quotations from literature, or other sources

·   Paper length = 1-2 pages

·   Thesis present

·  Presence of introduction and conclusion paragraphs

·  Original work

·   1 relevant OR connected quotation from literature, articles, class lectures 

OR

·   Paper length = 1-2 pages

·   Thesis is inadequate or underdeveloped

·  Presence of introduction and conclusion paragraphs

_______ x 15 =

 ______

_______ x 15 =

______

_______ x 15 =

______

FCA 3:  Word Bank & Conventions (20%--40 points)

·  Written in third person

·   Grammatical errors are non-existent or do not obfuscate meaning

·   Presence of 3 correctly used and indicated Word Bank words

·   No errors with run-ons

·   No errors with its/it’s

·   No errors with women/woman

·  Written in third person

·   1-4 grammatical errors which do not obfuscate meaning

·   Presence of 3 correctly used and indicated Word Bank words

·   1-3 Errors with the following:

·   Run-ons

·   Its/it’s

·   Women/woman

·  Attempts at writing in third person

·   4-10  grammatical errors which obfuscate meaning at times

·   Presence of 1-2 correctly used and indicated Word Bank words

·   4-6 Errors with the following:

· Run-ons

· Its/it’s

· Women/woman

·  Not written in third person

·   10+ major grammatical errors

·   No Word Bank words

·   7+ errors with the following:

· Run-ons

· Its/it’s

· Women/woman

_______ x 10 =

______

_______ x 10 =

______

_______ x  10 =

______

RESPONSE TO LITERATURERUBRIC

6

5

4

3

2

1

Peer evaluation

Self-Evaluation

Teacher Evaluation

CAPT SCORE (10%--20 points)

Initial Understanding

Demonstrates a basic understanding of the story as a whole.  The interpretation is richly supported with examples from the text.

Demonstrates a basic understanding of the story as a whole.  The interpretation is thoughtful and well-supported with examples from the text.

Demonstrates a basic understanding of the story as a whole & provides a plausible interpretation supported with examples from the text.

Demonstrates some understanding of portions of the text or of the story as a whole.

Demonstrates a literal or superficial understanding of portions of the text or the story as a whole

Demonstrates limited understanding &/or serious misunderstanding of portions of the text or the story as a whole.

______ x .83 = ______

______ x .83 =  ______

______ x .83 = ______

Inter-pretation

Demonstrates exceptional ability to reflect, revise, reshape &/or deepen initial understanding.

Demonstrates acceptable ability to reflect, revise, reshape &/or deepen initial understanding.

Demonstrates some ability to reflect, revise, reshape &/or deepen initial understanding.

Demonstrates limited ability to reflect, revise, reshape &/or deepen initial understanding.

Demonstrates little ability to reflect, revise, reshape &/or deepen initial understanding.

Demonstrates no ability to reflect, revise, reshape &/or deepen initial understanding.

______ x .83 = ______

______ x .83 =  ______

______ x .83 = ______

Connection

Demonstrates perceptive associations & connections between story & other texts &/or outside experiences & supports these connections with examples

Demonstrates associations/connections between the text, other texts, &/or outside experience; generally supports these connections with examples from the text

Demonstrates some associations/connections between the text, other texts, &/or outside experience, may not be supported with examples from the text

Demonstrates an association/connection between the text, other texts, &/or outside experience, superficial, lacks depth &/or support

Demonstrates difficulty making or supporting an association &/or connections between the story & outside experiences

Demonstrates no meaningful associations/connections between the text, other texts, &/or outside experiences

______ x .83 = ______

______ x .83 = ______

______ x .83 = ______

Critical Stance

Demonstrates perceptive judgments about the literary quality of the story & supports these judgments with examples from the text &/or outside experiences

Demonstrates thoughtful judgments about the literary quality of the story & supports these judgments with examples from the text &/or outside experiences

Demonstrates judgments about the literary quality of the story but they tend to lack depth &/or are not well supported with examples from the story &/or outside experiences.

Demonstrates judgments about the literary quality of the story but they lack depth & are not supported with examples from the story &/or outside experiences.

Demonstrates limited judgment about the literary quality that is superficial or emotional or is not supported with examples from the story or outside experiences.

Demonstrates no awareness of the literary quality of the story.

______ x .83 = ______

______ x .83 = ______

______ x .83 = ______