Criteria

Exemplary (4)

Acceptable (3.25)

Limited (2.5)

Deficient (1)

Role Completion Self-Analysis

Student demonstrates a thorough & honest understanding of his/her role & how well he/she fulfilled his/her responsibilities

Student demonstrates adequate understanding of his/her role & how well he/she fulfilled his/her responsibilities

Student demonstrates limited or unrealistic understanding of his/her role & how well he/she fulfilled his/her responsibilities

Student’s description of his/her completion does not match his/her output

Process Description

Student clearly grasps group’s planning process, & had pivotal role in process

Student grasps group’s planning process, & had a role in process

Student moderately grasps group’s planning process, & had a minor or undefined role in process

Student’s comprehension of process is superficial or absent; his/her role is questionable

Metacognition & Description of Learning

 Group’s questions have been effectively answered & individual student’s comprehension of issues has been enhanced

Group’s questions have been adequately answered & individual student’s comprehension of issues has been enhanced

Attempts made to answer group’s questions & student seems to have come upon some greater comprehension

Student’s learning is negligible or absent; questions have not been answered OR student has not had a role in answering the questions

Analysis of Challenges

Student honestly assesses challenges met during project & describes how challenges were handled

Student adequately assesses challenges met during project & describes how challenges were handled

Students has some understanding of how challenges were met

Student did not deal with challenges OR challenges were not accurately assessed