|
CRITERIA |
EXEMPLARY (4) |
PROFICIENT (3.25) |
LIMITED (2.5) |
DEFICIENT (1.75) |
N/A(0) |
|
Lesson
Plans
(28
points) |
· Immediately viable
· Rigorous for all learners
· Audience-Appropriate
· Creative
· Time-conscious
· Pragmatic
· Representative of MI |
· Viable with revision
· Rigorous for most learners
· (Audience-appropriate)
· Moderately creative
· Time-aware
· Minimally idealistic
· Moderately representative of MI |
· Portions are viable
· Intermittent rigor
· Generally audience-appropriate
· Some creativity
· Limited temporal awareness
· Idealistic
· Minimally representative of MI |
· Majority is not viable
· Rigor is negligible or indiscernible
· Inappropriate or irrelevant
· Little or no creativity
· Unaware of time constraints
· Extremely idealistic or unrealistic
· Little or no evidence of MI knowledge |
|
|
Summative
Writing Assignment
(20
points) |
· Audience-appropriate
· Rigorous
· Creative
· Student-accessible rubric
· Thorough knowledge of writing instruction demonstrated |
· (Audience-appropriate)
· Rigorous for most learners
· Moderately creative
· Rubric language minimally inaccessible
· Adequate knowledge of writing instruction demonstrated |
· Generally audience-appropriate
· Intermittent rigor
· Some creativity
· Rubric language difficult to access
· Some knowledge of writing instruction demonstrated |
· Inappropriate or irrelevant
· Rigor is negligible or indiscernible
· Little or no creativity
· Rubric language too simplistic or too advanced for audience
· Minimal or no knowledge of writing instruction demonstrated |
|
|
Materials/
Resources
(2+
supporting texts, seminar text, add’tl resources)
(12
points) |
· Audience-Appropriate
· Interconnected with “anchor” text(s)
· Represent a range of genres |
· (Audience-appropriate)
· Moderate connections with “anchor” text(s)
· Questionable range of materials |
· Generally audience-appropriate
· Minimal connections with “anchor” text(s)
· Insufficient range of materials |
· Inappropriate or irrelevant
· Inappropriate or indiscernible connections with “anchor” text(s)
· No range of materials
|
|
|
Seminar
Questions
(8
points) |
· Demonstrate depth of knowledge of varied question strategies
· Permit access for all students |
· Demonstrate knowledge of varied question strategies
· Permit access for most students |
· Demonstrates minimal knowledge of question strategies
· Permit access for few students |
· Absent or insufficient knowledge of question strategies
· Minimal access for students |
|
|
Modifications:
· ELL
· Below-level reader
· Special Education
· Extension
(18
points) |
· Appropriate for learner (2)
· Rigorous for learner (2)
· Inviting & engaging (2)
· Culturally cognizant (2)
· Sufficient scaffolding present (2)
· Reading strategies used (2)
· Capitalizes upon student’s potential strengths (2)
· Authentic (2)
· Creative (2) |
· (Appropriate for learner)
· Moderately rigorous for learner
· Moderately inviting & engaging
· Attempt to be culturally cognizant
· Some scaffolding present
· Some reading strategies used
· Attempts made to capitalize upon strengths
· Minimally “forced”
· Moderately creative |
· Generally appropriate
· Minimally rigorous
· Minimally inviting and/or engaging
· Minimal cultural cognizance
· Scaffolding intermittent
· Minimal reading strategies used
· Minimal attempt to capitalize upon strengths
· Substantially “forced”
· Minimally creative |
· Inappropriate or ill-suited
· Rigor is negligible or indiscernible
· Uninviting or boring
· No cultural awareness, potentially offensive
· Negligible or absent scaffolding
· Sparse or no reading strategies used
· Unaware of student’s potential strengths
· Very “forced”
· Little or no creativity |
|
|
Organization/
Presentation
(16 points) |
· Requirements followed to the “t”
· Organized & “Clean”
· Easily followed
· Error-free |
· Most requirements met
· Primarily organized
· Moderately easy to follow
· 1-2 Errors |
· Requirements passively attempted
· Questionable organization
· Difficult to follow
· 3-4 Errors |
· Requirements ignored or indiscernible
· Minimal or no organization
· Very difficult to follow
· 5 + Errors |
|
|
Rationale
Statement
(24
points) |
· Deep foundation in sound pedagogy (8)
· Self-reflective (8)
· Curricular choices explicated adroitly and adequately (8) |
· Acceptable pedagogical knowledge
· Moderately self-reflective
· Curricular choices adequately explained |
· Limited pedagogical knowledge
· Minimally self-reflective
· Limited ability to explain choices |
· Indiscernible pedagogical knowledge represented
· Absent or inaccurate self-reflection
· Inadequate ability to explain choices |
|
